Since
all Jehovah’s creatures are perfect…(Since Adam became imperfect when he sinned…)[1]
The WTS does
not support this bald assertion with Scriptural references, with good reason. There aren’t any. In Genesis, Jehovah
God calls his creation “very good,” but very good is not at all identical with perfect. This is important
and quite significant as to WTS theology. Nowhere in the Old or New Testament is God’s uncorrupted creation referred
to as “perfect,” neither explicitly or implicitly.
Please note
that “perfect” is not included in any of the above definitions of “good”. The definition indicates
something pleasant or agreeable – not perfect.
Genesis 1:31, however, modifies “good” with “very”, which BDB defined
as:
Exceedingly
pleasant or agreeable, yes. Perfect? No. Perfect is not at all implied in either of the Creation accounts in the Bible, nor
in the pre-Fall passages in Chapter 3.
Human beings
were not created “perfect,” for humans were able to sin, as the story of the Fall readily demonstrates…***UNDER CONSTRUCTION***
p. 29,
Paragraph 6:
...Satan
the Devil. He apparently heard God tell Adam and Eve to have children and fill the earth with their offspring. (Genesis 1:27, 28) 'Why all these humans could worship me rather than God!' Satan evidently thought.[4]
Genesis 1:27, 28[27] So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created
he them.[28]And God blessed them, and God
said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the
sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. (KJV)
It is quite
apparent and evident that Satan is not mentioned in Genesis 1:27-28 and equally evident and apparent that the WTBTS has made a profound leap into speculation and
conjecture that is not in any way supported by the Scriptures.
p. 31-32, Paragraph 11:
Jesus
never doubted that Satan is the ruler of this world. In some miraculous way, Satan once showed Jesus "all the kingdoms of
the world and their glory." Satan then promised Jesus: "All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of
worship of me." (Matthew 4:8, 9; Luke 4:5, 6) Think about this. Would that offer have been a temptation to Jesus if Satan was not the ruler of these kingdoms?...
Matthew
4: 8, 9 [8] Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms
of the world, and the glory of them; [9] And saith unto him,
All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. (KJV)
Luke 4:5, 6 [5] And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all
the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. [6] And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and
the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. (KJV)
The devil
showed Jesus all the kingdoms of the world and offered Jesus power over them, yes. But that does not demand that Satan legitimately
possessed power over the kingdoms of the world. Satan, after all, is a liar:
John 8:44Ye
are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not
in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the
father of it. (KJV)
The WTBTS
asserted that if Satan did not legitimately possess power over all the kingdoms of the world, the temptation would not have
been genuine, but that is not so. Eve was tempted, genuinely tempted, by the fruit and by what the serpent said. But the serpent
lied:
Genesis
3:13And
the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did
eat. (KJV)
...Jesus
did not deny that all these wordly governments were Satan's...[5]
Logical fallacy
- argument from silence:
The argument from silence (also called argumentum a silentio in Latin) is generally a conclusion based on silence or lack of contrary evidence.[6]
Jesus didn't
deny it, but he didn’t confirm that they belonged to Satan, either.
Perhaps, Jesus was busy rebuking
Satan:
Matthew 4:10Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written,… (KJV)
Or maybe
more concerned, at that point, with emphasizing who one should properly worship.
The point is the WTS has made
an unnecessary and logically fallacious leap.
…Surely,
Jesus would have done that if Satan was not the power behind them…[7]
Surely, Jesus
would have focused on to whom proper worship is to be given – which was Satan’s challenge and the subject Jesus
addressed. As the text tells us.
p. 32,
paragraph 12:
...Yet
nowhere does the Bible say that either Jehovah or Jesus Christ is ruler of this world...[8]
Matthew
28:18And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. (KJV)
...In
fact, Jesus specifically referred to Satan as "the ruler of this world." (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11)...[9]
John
12:31 Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince
of this world be cast out. (KJV)
John
14:30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince
of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.
(KJV)
John 16:11Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged. (KJV)
Please
note that all of the references the WTBTS cites occurs before Christ's work on the cross. John 14:30 even notes this
when Jesus said the ruler of this world is coming and what resulted in Satan's coming, doing his worst to our Savior? Salvation.
...salvation to everyone that believeth... (Romans 1:16).
Of 12:31, A.T. Robertson wrote:
The
prince of this world (ho archōn tou kosmou toutou). This phrase here, descriptive of Satan as in possession of
the evil world, occurs again in Joh 14:30; Joh 16:11. In the temptations Satan claims power over the world and offers to share
it with Jesus (Mat 4:8-10; Luk 4:5-8). Jesus did not deny Satan’s power then, but here proclaims final victory over
him. (Emphasis mine)[10]
Of the same,
Gill wrote,
"The
phrase, שר העולם, "the prince of the
world", is much used by Jewish writers (d), by whom an angel is meant; and they seem to design the angel of death, which is
the devil: and it is certain, that he is here intended, and is so called, not because he has any legal power and authority
over the world; but because he has usurped a dominion over it...now the time was at hand, when he should be cast out of
the empire of the world he had assumed..." (Emphasis mine)[11]
As a believer
in Christ, Satan is no ruler over me. Nor does Satan have so much as a smidgeon of authority over any other believer. Christ's
death on the cross removed Satan's power over believers.
Luke
10:19Behold,
I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall by any means
hurt you. (KJV)
...The
Bible even refers to Satan the Devil as "the god of this system of things." (2 Corinthians 4:3, 4)...[12]
2
Corinthians 4:3-4 [3]But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:[4] In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light
of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. (KJV)
Jamieson,
Fausset and Brown wrote, "The worldly make him their God (Phi 3:19).
He is, in fact, "the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that ruleth in the children of disobedience" (Eph 2:2)."[13] To which, Albert Barnes elaborated:
The
name “god” is here given to him, not because he has any divine attributes, but because he actually has the homage
of the people of this world as their god, as the being who is really worshipped, or who has the affections of their hearts
in the same way as it is given to idols. By “this world” is meant the wicked world; or the mass of people. He
has dominion over the world. They obey his will; they execute his plans; they further his purposes, and they are his obedient
subjects. He has subdued the world to himself, and was really adored in the place of the true God; see the note on 1Co 10:20. “They sacrificed to devils and not to God.” Here it is meant by the
declaration that Satan is the god of this world:
(1) That the world at large was under his control and direction. He
secured the apostasy of man, and early brought him to follow his plans; and he has maintained his scepter and dominion since.
No more abject submission could be desired by him than has been rendered by the mass of people.
(2) the idolatrous
world particularly is under his control, and subject to him; 1Co 10:20. He is worshipped there; and the religious rites and ceremonies of the pagan are in general just such as a mighty
being who hated human happiness, and who sought pollution, obscenity, wretchedness, and blood would appoint; and over all
the pagan world his power is absolute. In the time of Paul all the world, except the Jews and Christians, was sunk in pagan
degradation.
(3) he rules in the hearts and lives of all wicked people - and the world is full of wicked people. They
obey him, and submit to his will in executing fraud, and rapine, and piracy, and murder, and adultery, and lewdness; in wars
and fightings; in their amusements and pastimes; in dishonesty and falsehood. The dominion of Satan over this world has been,
and is still almost universal and absolute; nor has the lapse of 1,800 years rendered the appellation improper as descriptive
of his influence, that he is the god of this world. The world pursues his plans; yields to his temptations; neglects, or rejects
the reign of God as he pleases; and submits to his scepter, and is still full of abomination cruelty, and pollution, as he
desires it to be.[14]
Satan is
no legitimate god. He is a false god the ungodly worship and serve, as false idols were worshipped and served in the OT. Are
you ungodly? Then Satan is your god. He is not mine. I do not worship him. I do not serve him.
…Regarding
this opposer, or Satan, the Christian apostle John wrote: "The whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one."--1 John
5:19.[15]
Jamieson,
Fausset and Brown wrote:
The
world lieth in the power of, and abiding in, the wicked one, as the resting-place and lord of his slaves; compare "abideth
in death," 1Jo 3:14; contrast 1Jo 5:20,
"we are in Him that is true." While the believer has been delivered out of his power, the whole world lieth helpless and motionless
still in it, just as it was; including the wise, great, respectable, and all who are not by vital union in Christ.[16]
This is
contrasting believers vs unbelievers.
p. 34,
paragraph 20:
…As
time passes, parts of the earth already subdued will expand until the whole globe is as beautiful and productive as the garden
of Eden…[17]
What Scripture
says the earth will be turned into a paradise, post-Tribulation, over a period of time???
NONE.
p. 36,
paragraph 23:
...All
those sleeping in death who are in God's memory will be brought back to life. In fact, "there is going to be a resurrection
of both the righteous and the unrighteous." Acts 24:15; John 5:28, 29.[18]
Acts 24:15And
have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and
unjust. (KJV)
John 5:28-29 [28]
Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which
all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,
[29] And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the
resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. (KJV)
John explained the resurrection of the righteous and unrighteous -
one to life, the other to judgment. Neither John (nor Luke in Acts) say everybody will be resurrected for another chance at
it.
Please note (to borrow brotherbrian's terminology from CARM), the doctrinal drop-in "who are in God's memory".
What Scriptures
state only those "in God's memory" are going to be resurrected?[19]
What Scriptures
state that the dead are only in God's memory?
p. 36, Paragraph 24:
It was to the coming
Paradise on earth that Jesus pointed when he promised the evildoer who died alongside him: “You will be
with me in Paradise.” (Luke 23:43)[20]
Luke 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee,
Today shalt thou be with me in paradise. (KJV)
For a thorough examination
of Luke 23:43, which readily addresses WTS assertions, please see KNOWLEDGE, Chapter 1 at
http://www.thearmchairscholar.org/id10.html . All except the very beginning of that paper addresses WTS claims about Luke 23:43. See also the comprehensive list of every
amhn legw reference in the New Testament at: http://www.thearmchairscholar.org/id11.html.
Jesus told the thief who
had faith that the thief would be with Jesus in paradise that very day. Needless to say, the earth wasn’t a paradise
at the time of Jesus’ crucifixion so Jesus must have been referring to a paradise that was located elsewhere, in Heaven,
as the other New Testament usages of the word paradeisos (“paradise”) shows.
[1]Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. WHAT DOES THE
BIBLE Really TEACH?, 2005. P. 28 (P.29)
[2]Brown, Francis and C. Briggs
and S. Driver. “Entry for H2896 ṭôb.”Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon, Reprint 1996.
[3]Brown, Francis and C. Briggs
and S. Driver. “Entry for H3966 me'ôd.”Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon, Reprint 1996.
[4]Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. WHAT DOES THE
BIBLE Really TEACH?, 2005. Pp. 31-32
[5]Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. WHAT DOES THE
BIBLE Really TEACH?, 2005. P. 32
[7]Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. WHAT DOES THE
BIBLE Really TEACH?, 2005. P. 32
[8]Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. WHAT DOES THE
BIBLE Really TEACH?, 2005. P. 32
[9]Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. WHAT DOES THE
BIBLE Really TEACH?, 2005. P. 32
[10]Robertson, A.T. “Commentary
on John 12:31.”
Robertson’s Word Pictures, 1966.
[11]Gill, John. “Commentary
on John 12:31.” John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible, 1690-1771.
[12]Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. WHAT DOES THE
BIBLE Really TEACH?, 2005. P. 32
[13]Jamieson, Robert and Fausset,
A. R. and Brown, David. “Commentary on 2 Corinthians 4:4.” Jamieson, Fausset and Brown Commentary Critical
and Explanatory on the Whole Bible. 1871.
[14]Barnes, Albert. "Commentary
on 2 Corinthians 4:4." Barnes' Notes on the Bible, 1798-1870.
[15]Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. WHAT DOES THE
BIBLE Really TEACH?, 2005. P. 32
[16]Jamieson, Robert and Fausset,
A. R. and Brown, David. “Commentary on 1 John 5:19.” Jamieson, Fausset and Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory
on the Whole Bible. 1871.
[17]Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. WHAT DOES THE
BIBLE Really TEACH?, 2005. P. 34
[18]Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. WHAT DOES THE
BIBLE Really TEACH?, 2005. P. 36